Fill Your Da 2166 9 1 Template

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is essential for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, several other documents often accompany this form to ensure a comprehensive assessment and compliance with Army regulations. Below is a list of these documents, each serving a specific purpose in the evaluation process.

• DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It is used to document counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. The form captures the soldier's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement, providing a basis for future evaluations.
• DA Form 67-9: This is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER). While it pertains to officers, it may be referenced during NCO evaluations to compare leadership and performance standards across ranks.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It is crucial for assessing an NCO's physical readiness and overall fitness, which are key components of their evaluation.
• Release of Liability Form: This legal document releases one party from responsibility for risks or injuries that may occur, often used in activities with a chance of injury. For more information, visit fastpdftemplates.com/.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used for recording body fat measurements. They help ensure compliance with Army weight standards, which is an important aspect of an NCO's performance evaluation.
• DA Form 1059: This is the Academic Evaluation Report. It documents a soldier’s performance in military schools or training programs. Achievements in education can positively influence an NCO's evaluation.
• DA Form 201: This is the Military Personnel Records Jacket. It contains a soldier's career information, including assignments, training, and evaluations, which can be referenced during the evaluation process.
• DA Form 4187: This form is used for personnel actions, such as requests for awards, reassignments, or promotions. It may accompany the evaluation to provide context for the NCO's performance.
• AR 623-3: This regulation outlines the Army's evaluation system. It provides guidance on the evaluation process, ensuring that all assessments, including those of NCOs, are conducted fairly and consistently.
• DA PAM 623-3: This pamphlet serves as a guide to the evaluation process. It offers detailed instructions on completing evaluation forms and the roles of raters and senior raters, ensuring clarity in the evaluation process.

These documents collectively support the evaluation process, providing a well-rounded view of an NCO's performance, potential, and readiness. Understanding the purpose of each form can enhance the evaluation experience for both the evaluator and the evaluated, fostering growth and development within the ranks.

Guidelines on How to Fill Out Da 2166 9 1

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential task that requires attention to detail. Once you have completed the form, it will need to be submitted to the appropriate authorities for processing. This ensures that your evaluation is recorded accurately and can be referenced in future assessments.

1. Part I - Administrative Data:
   • Enter your name (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Provide your SSN or DOD ID Number.
   • Fill in your rank.
   • Indicate your date of rank.
   • List your PMOSC.
   • Provide your unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, and major command.
   • Fill in your status code.
   • Enter your UIC.
   • Specify the reason for submission.
   • Indicate the period covered (from and through dates).
   • List the rated months.
   • Fill in the non-rated codes.
   • Indicate the number of enclosures.
   • Provide the rated NCO's email address (.gov or .mil).
2. Part II - Authentication:
   • Enter the name of the rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Provide the rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
   • Obtain the rater's signature.
   • Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD).
   • List the rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
   • Provide the rater's email address (.gov or .mil).
   • Enter the name of the senior rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Provide the senior rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
   • Obtain the senior rater's signature.
   • Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD).
   • List the senior rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
   • Provide the senior rater's email address (.gov or .mil).
   • If applicable, enter the name of the supplementary reviewer (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • List the supplementary reviewer's rank, PMOSC/organization duty assignment.
   • Indicate if a review is required (Yes/No).
   • Provide comments if necessary.
   • Obtain the supplementary reviewer's signature.
   • Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD).
   • Provide the supplementary reviewer's email address (.gov or .mil).
   • Indicate if enclosures are included (Yes/No).
3. Part III - Duty Description (Rater):
   • Enter the principal duty title.
   • Provide the duty MOSC.
   • Describe daily duties and scope, including people, equipment, facilities, and dollars.
   • List areas of special emphasis.
   • Indicate any appointed duties.
4. Part IV - Performance Evaluation:
   • Record the APFT pass/fail/profile status and date.
   • Fill in height and weight, and indicate if within standard.
   • Provide comments for any failed APFT or if not within Army weight standards.
   • Evaluate character and provide bullet comments.
   • Assess presence and provide comments.
   • Evaluate intellect and provide comments.
   • Assess leadership qualities and provide comments.
   • Evaluate development efforts and provide comments.
   • Assess achievements and provide comments.
   • Provide an overall performance rating.
5. Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential:
   • Select a box indicating the rated NCO’s potential.
   • Provide comments regarding the rated NCO's potential.
   • List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is similar to the Employee Performance Review (EPR) used in civilian workplaces. Both documents serve as formal assessments of an individual's performance over a specific period. The EPR typically includes sections for evaluating competencies, achievements, and areas for improvement, much like the DA Form. Both forms require signatures from supervisors and provide an opportunity for employees to acknowledge their understanding of the evaluation process.

When dealing with legal matters related to restraining orders, understanding the documentation involved is crucial. The California DV 260 form is one such critical document, providing essential information to law enforcement while safeguarding confidentiality. If you're looking to gather more information on how to fill out this form, you can visit californiapdfforms.com/california-dv-260-form/ for further guidance.

Another comparable document is the Performance Appraisal Form utilized by federal agencies. This form is designed to assess an employee's work performance and contributions to the agency's goals. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it includes sections for setting performance objectives and evaluating the employee's success in meeting them. Both forms emphasize the importance of feedback from both the employee and the supervisor, fostering a dialogue about performance and development.

The Officer Evaluation Report (OER) is also similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, as it evaluates the performance of officers in the military. Both forms require detailed assessments of an individual's competencies, leadership abilities, and potential for future assignments. The OER includes ratings and comments from superiors, paralleling the structure of the NCO Evaluation Report. Both documents play a crucial role in career progression and promotion considerations.

The Civilian Evaluation Report (CER) used in various government agencies shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1. This report assesses the performance of civilian employees and includes a structured format for supervisors to evaluate their subordinates. Both forms focus on performance metrics, accomplishments, and professional development, ensuring that employees receive constructive feedback to enhance their careers.

Lastly, the Performance Review Document (PRD) used in many private sector companies resembles the DA Form 2166-9-1. The PRD assesses employee performance based on set criteria, including goals and competencies. Like the DA Form, it often requires a review and acknowledgment by both the employee and their manager. Both documents aim to provide a comprehensive view of an employee's contributions, facilitating discussions about future opportunities and growth within the organization.

The DA 2166 9 1 form is essential for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, several misconceptions exist regarding its purpose and use. Below are some common misunderstandings:

• Misconception 1: The form is only for negative evaluations.

This is incorrect. The DA 2166 9 1 form is used for both positive and negative assessments. It aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of an NCO's performance.

• Misconception 2: Only the rater fills out the form.

In reality, both the rater and the senior rater contribute to the evaluation. Their combined insights help create a more accurate assessment of the NCO's performance.

• Misconception 3: The rated NCO has no role in the evaluation process.

This is not true. The rated NCO is required to review the completed report and acknowledge that the administrative data is correct. Their signature does not imply agreement with the evaluation but confirms the accuracy of the information.

• Misconception 4: The form is optional for NCOs.

The DA 2166 9 1 form is mandatory for evaluating NCOs. It is a crucial part of the performance management process in the Army.

• Misconception 5: The evaluation only considers job performance.

While job performance is significant, the evaluation also considers attributes such as leadership, professionalism, and adherence to Army values.

• Misconception 6: There is no appeals process for evaluations.

This is false. The rated NCO is informed about the appeals process as part of the evaluation. They have the right to appeal if they believe the evaluation is unjust.

• Misconception 7: The DA 2166 9 1 form is the only evaluation tool used.

While it is a primary tool, other evaluation forms and processes may also be utilized depending on the specific circumstances and requirements.

• Misconception 8: The form does not impact career progression.

Evaluations on the DA 2166 9 1 form can significantly influence an NCO's career progression, including promotions and assignments.